Tag Archives: biblical-fiction

P.L. Travers Christmas story on BBC


I came across a beautifully dramatized Christmas story on BBC this afternoon, originally written as a short story by P. L. Travers.  It’s called “The Fox at the Manger” and the voices and music are lovely to listen to.  Actress Wendy Hiller lends voice as the narrator.  It would make a great bedtime story for children this holiday season.  It is available for a limited time only.

Leave a comment

Posted by on December 23, 2016 in Audio/Radio Dramas


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Movie Review: My “BEN-HUR” Experience

b64a44c9e00fd891e11b829d49fa28fbBased on the book by Lew Wallace.

Version: 2016

Genre: drama, Christian, bible era

Plot Summary: Judah Ben-Hur is the son of a Jewish nobleman.  Mesala is a Roman who grew up orphaned.  The two share a bond as (adopted) brothers but a misunderstanding takes place turning their affection to hatred.  As Judah is sent to the prison galley slave ships and Messala rises in military rank, all looks as though there is no place for God, peace, or love in this world.  But Judah is given a second chance, to either choose faith in a Carpenter from Galilee, or seeking revenge in the Roman circus.

My Review: I have awaited this day for so long.  The day when Ben-Hur would be brought to it’s full glory and excitement on the big screen with a full-blown budget!  I remember staying up late into the night the summer I was fifteen years old when I was staying at my grandparents’.  The cause of my insomnia was the novel, “Ben-Hur,” by Gen. Lew Wallace.  The book has remained among my top favorites, though I’ve read hundreds over the years.

I’ve seen the old 1959 Charlton Heston version. And contrary to most people’s opinions, I’ve never cared for it.  I’m sure it was a huge deal when it came out back then, breaking records with being the  biggest budget film and using the most paid actors’ of its time.  But watching it after the era of The Lord of the Rings… it just failed to get my heart racing.  And Charlton Heston fails (IMO) to look the part of Judah Ben-Hur; too old and he’s just not how I imagined him.  So many things needed improved upon.  I didn’t even bother with the 2010 tv movie, having heard how certain themes I don’t agree with were inserted into it.  And I’ve seen a couple of scenes on TCM from the ancient 1907 one, but even though I’m sure it was a big deal 109 years ago… I mean, come on.

That was when I began to wish and pray for the epic remake. And I was thrilled earlier on this year to find out that was the case (see my post here).  It was a rainy day today and made perfect for having an adventure at the movie theatre!  And so I got my wish.

I went into this having read a review preparing me for the fact that this version leaves a lot of the Christian gospel out. I was disappointed to hear that, but I still wanted to go see it.  I’m sorry to report that despite my excitement over it, I came away rating it only 3 out of 5 stars.  I will write my pros and cons of it below.  Be aware there it is riddled with spoilers:

serveimagePROS: Oh, boy! Was it ever exciting! Movie-makers really outdid themselves when it came to recreating a gigantic Roman circus arena, a nail biting Roman sea battle, and a heart pounding chariot race.  If that is what attracts you about the book, then by all means you’re going to love this!  Drums, hoofbeats, fire, drama, peril, battles, horses, crashes, crowds, roars!  This movie is not lacking in adventure!

Costumes and props are so beautiful to look at. Loved the women’s hairstyles, and Tirzah’s pink evening toga.  Bright colors and gorgeous jewelry.  I’d watch it again just for that!

I felt the characters were well-cast. Although Mesala (Toby Kebbell) wasn’t quite how I pictured him in the book, I thought he was the best actor out of the whole movie.  I would be interested in seeing him in future movies.  Judah looked right for his role.  Esther was how I’d always pictured her, and Tirzah and Mrs. Ben-Hur also were gorgeous actors.  It was also enjoyable getting to see Morgan Freeman as the sheik  Ilderim and loved how they featured him as narrator in the opening scene.

I am happy to say that there are no sex scenes to worry about! The trailer is actually more suggestive than the film.  Anyone watching based on this hope will be mightily disappointed.

serveimageCons: This is where the 3 stars come in. It all boils down to how a story is told, and this film version got a lot of things wrong in this area.

Let’s start with how it holds up to the book. I am not one of those who believes movie versions should be exactly like the original book.  However.  A lot of liberties were taken with this story and it doesn’t do it any justice.  It just makes things confusing and unbelievable.  I ended up not caring too much for the characters like I’d wanted to.  I didn’t feel emotionally involved with them.  I was just there for the chariot race.

Some of my favorite characters were left entirely out. There’s no Quintus Arrius.  There’s Amrah.  There’s no Iras.  QA is one of my favorites because he provides the story with heart.  He is the kind Roman captain of the slave ship Judah is sent to, who Judah ends up saving during the battle, and who adopts Judah and leaves his inheritance to when he dies.  Judah comes back to Jerusalem like a bible era Count of Monte Cristo. I can see why the movie scriptwriters decided QA was expendable, but I genuinely missed him.  Amrah is Judah’s old nurse, who also provides heart in the book.  The character that is NOT expendable is Iras, the wily daughter of Egypt who tempts Judah from his goals and what is good.  She is in cahoots with Messala and creates a rivalry against Esther for Judah’s affections.  Why does every film version leave this character out?  Not that I’m wishing for it, but if Hollywood wanted steam, they could find a way with this ‘Cleopatra.’

Which leads me to the romance between Judah and Esther. I must say it was a lot better than the old Heston version in which man sees woman, man kisses woman.  The end.  But whoever rewrote Ben-Hur this time around completely killed any suspense they could have made with plot element as well.  They marry them off too quickly… in the beginning!  Now, we loyal Ben-Hur fans know that Esther doesn’t come into the novel until somewheres in the middle.  I get why Hollywood would introduce her earlier in the movie, but where’s the tension?  There’s tension in a story where Esther waits and hopes for 5 long years and then finds Judah again when he comes back, but he’s not the same anymore being filled with hatred for Messala, and meanwhile Iras is fighting for his attention. What will happen next?  Will love conquer all?  But no, they completely ruined the tale by rewriting it.

Where they snipped the romantic tension in one area, they tried to add it in another. Tirzah and Messala are now lovers.  This wouldn’t have been a big deal to me, except that it makes for a completely unbelievable situation when Messala all of a sudden orders Judah’s sister crucified.  Why, when he had genuinely seemed to love her?  And at the end when everyone is hugging and cuddling and crying, and Messala hobbles up on his one existent leg, Tirzah doesn’t seem to mind a bit and it’s assumed the two get together in the end anyway.  Yeah, I’d totally if a hot man ordered me to death by crucifixion!

Other motives didn’t seem to make much sense. Like Druses’ saving Judah’s family’s lives after Judah threatens to kill him.  Huh?  And then there were certain other smaller parts of the film that came across as being hokey, like Judah’s sister and mother suddenly being healed of leprosy… by being rained upon.  No, no, no!  In the book it was Jesus who touched them and had compassion on them!

I went into this having read a review that prepared me to not expect to see a gospel presentation here. OK, I don’t have to have preaching.  But I do need a reason why Judah’s heart and life was changed.  I was glad to see parts of the story of Jesus portrayed, and Judah’s encounters with him, especially when he is a witness to Jesus’ death at the cross.  But without the resurrection, there is no meaning to it all and there is no purpose to us forgiving and loving one another.  And that is one of the biggest ways in which this movie fails big time: the lack of the Resurrection.  It’s not even hinted at.  There can be no inspiration for a changed life by seeing a man hanging on a cross, simply because there is no life at all.  But by faith in the living Jesus and with His life at work in us, we know that this life is not all there is and can therefore have peace and joy, and his victory and power enable us to forgive and love our enemies.  None of that came across in the film, and I’m afraid anyone who knows little about this spiritual aspect of things would fail to make the connection.

The worse, from a storyteller’s point of view, was the ending. This may come across as sounding pretty terrible, but I felt it was ruined because Messala lived and forgave Judah and all became one big happy family again.  That is cleaned-up Hollywood.  In the original book, Messala becomes paralyzed/crippled for life and ends up killing himself.  Judah does gain the ability to forgive him, but Messala’s life is not changed.  To see the ‘two brothers’ flip their attitudes toward each other on a dime, after they each tried to murder each other by various cruel and unusual punishments, is totally unbelievable.

Lew Wallace was a storyteller, you know? There’s a reason why his book has been well-loved for a hundred and fifty years.  Why must Hollywood think there’s a need to rewrite it?  And then they’re a surprised when it’s a ‘big box office flop.’  I’m sorry for that, but they asked for it!  You can’t just bank on a big budget to make an excellent film.  You have to tell a good story.  A believable one, where viewers identify with the characters and can empathize with them.  But this was not that story.

Would I recommend it? It depends on how much of a stickler you are for the original.  If you’ve never read the book and just want a clean, exciting flick, I think you could enjoy it.  (Be aware there are some gruesome battle images, and scenes that include crucifixion.)  But if you’re too much of a loyalist like I am, you might want to wait another 55+ years for them to do the tale justice.

Leave a comment

Posted by on August 28, 2016 in Movie Reviews


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

It’s Here! New Christian Fiction for Spring 2016!

One of the best things about the bleak midwinter is that we get to look forward to all the exciting new Christian fiction coming out in the spring!  Here are a few that I’m looking forward to:


Leave a comment

Posted by on January 16, 2016 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , ,

BBC Radio Drama: Ben Hur

43ef859338933ea30bff199403fcd0e7Hey all!  The complete BBC radio drama version of Ben-Hur (based on the novel by Lew Wallace) is currently playable for a limited time on Radio 4!  You can listen by clicking here.  This seemed to be a very good adaptation, from the bits I listened to.  Jamie Glover plays Judah Ben-Hur (Glover also played the voice of Prince Rilian in Focus on the Family’s Radio Theatre The Silver Chair).  Enjoy!  *For clarification, this is not the same as Focus on the Family’s Radio Theatre version, which I highly recommend!!

Leave a comment

Posted by on July 31, 2015 in Audio/Radio Dramas


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Book Review: An Echo in the Darkness, by Francine Rivers

46601Genre: Christian Inspirational; drama; historical fiction

Plot Summary: Book #2 of the Mark of the Lion Trilogy continues with the story of the Valerians’ lives after the perceived death of their servant girl, Hadassah.  Marcus leaves Ephesus to travel Palestine in search of relief from his grief, but finds he can’t outrun God.  Julia visits the Asklepion and numerous doctors to find a cure for her mysterious disease, but also needs a cure for her soul.  And Hadassah is rescued by a young doctor for a purpose… could it be to forgive those who wronged her?

My Book Review:  The Mark of the Lion Trilogy by Francine Rivers has been around for quite a while.  Rivers (see her website here) is generally thought of as being one of the best writers in the Christian fiction world.  I may be a little late discovering her books, but I loved reading the first book (A Voice in the Wind) last year, and couldn’t wait to read the next installment, An Echo in the Darkness.  All of the elements I loved about the first one were present in this book as well… drama, character development, suspense, great dialogue…  This was the third book I’ve read by Francine Rivers, and with each one I’ve found it very hard not to flip ahead to the next chapter to see what was going to happen.  I never have this trouble with any other book!

The Mark of the Lion books are thick; chapters varying in length but they are usually not tediously long.  There are frequent breaks within chapters as well, which I always appreciate.

I will have to say that I probably enjoyed Book 1 more than An Echo… just because there is more action in the first.  In it we had gladiator fights, battles, romance developing between Marcus and Hadassah, and Julia getting herself into various troubles.  I was eager to read the second novel, and enjoyed it because it continued with the same characters, but there were not many points of action to keep it exciting.  As with A Voice…, I found it troubled by repetition, which dragged the story out a bit too much.  Repetitious conversations between the same characters over and over in the same repetitious settings.  On one hand, I can see that the author was trying to convey the sense of frustration the characters had at finding themselves in situations where they didn’t know how God was orchestrating His plan.  Life can be slow-moving at times!

Mark of the Lion Series by Francine Rivers - My favorite series everOne of the things I love most about Francine Rivers is her excellent character development.  Marcus, Hadassah, and Julia aren’t just fictional people.  They’re so realistic they feel like family.  The characters grow and change, but it happens slowly and subtly and is very believable.  You learn to care about these folks!

A word on some of the characters: I had a hard time connecting with the character of Hadassah.  I feel terrible about this, since she was the main heroine.  I mean I liked her, but she just seemed so perfect, even in the middle of her struggles that it was hard to identify with her.  And although I had interest in Marcus, I still had a hard time (as I did in the first book) understanding why Hadassah was so in love with him.  Even after his conversion, I had a hard time seeing it.  I do appreciate that the author didn’t write Marcus to automatically become so irritatingly saintly (and boring) after he comes to Christ, as other Christian fiction can sometimes be.  Instead, he struggles with anger and harbors unforgiveness.  He has to learn to allow God to begin to mold him.

I have a confession: I much preferred Alexander to Marcus.  I mean as a love interest for Hadassah.  I don’t know what it is with me, but it seems I always “fall” for the wrong person in a book or movie!  I guess that shows what poor judgment I have!

The focus of the third and final book (As Sure as the Dawn) is the character of Atretes, who was introduced to us in Book 1.  I don’t really understand the unbalanced story arc here.  He was left out of Book 2, and it is my understanding that Marcus and Hadassah do not appear in Book 3, their story being over with.  It’s too bad that their intertwining stories couldn’t have been spread out between the Books 2 & 3 (if I’m confusing here, never mind…).

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Someone seriously needs to make this series into an audio drama at least, if not a movie!  And not just a low-budget attempt at a production, either.  I’m talking EPIC here!  The last chapter in particular is extremely beautiful, so if you’ve been putting off reading this trilogy… WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR?!





Leave a comment

Posted by on June 28, 2015 in Book Reviews


Tags: , , , , , ,

On Controversy Over New Left Behind Movie

nic-cage-open-letter-sliderI don’t know about you, but I’m getting mighty tired of hearing fellow Christians shooting ourselves in the foot and producing embarrassing testimonies by being so harsh and critical of the new religious movies that have been coming out recently.  I remember there was an outcry from some folks who were planning on boycotting Prince Caspian when it came out because “it wasn’t word for word as the book.”  Other movies are deemed too hokey, or too casual, or too overly-dramatic, or too imaginative, or too imperfect to go see.  It can become a form of self-righteousness.  “I won’t go to see that film because I don’t agree with that actor’s personal life…”  Or whatever the case may be.

MovieGuide recently posted an article and an open letter to Nicholas Cage that I think is very good and worth reading.

The bad in Hollywood keeps getting worse.  But the door is swinging wider open all the time for much good news in the film industry, and for that I heartily applaud movie-makers who have a hand in it!  Keep it coming!  And fellow believers, we’ve waited too long for this opportunity of good, clean Christian art in the movie entertainment-world to be continually shutting down honest efforts.  Instead of legalism and small-mindedness, let’s get out there and make it even better!

“Left Behind” is based on the best selling book by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins.


Leave a comment

Posted by on November 2, 2014 in Uncategorized


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Book Review: Pearl in the Sand, Tessa Afshar

Pearl in the SandGenre: Christian fiction; biblical fiction; historical fiction; romance

Plot Summary: Rahab is only a young girl living in the ancient city of Jericho when her father sells her into prostitution to save the family from starvation.  Her spirit broken, she believes that life is nothing but one rejection after another for her.  But when news reaches of her of a holy God who seems to have a heart of mercy, something in her longs for His acceptance of her.  A young man named Salmone yearns to be a picture of God’s love toward her.  Whether or not she can accept it is the real test of faith for Rahab.

My Book Review: I remember when this book came out a few years ago.  There was something about the story that hooked me and made me say, “I’ll have to read this!!”  I especially wanted to read it after listening to an interview with the author Tessa Afshar and was struck by her passion for God.  I waited weeks for this to come available at my library because I knew instinctively there was something good I felt God wanted me to get out of it.

Let’s start with the book cover.  Completely gripping!  I love the rich colors, the saturated reds, browns and blues.  And the models used for the characters are spot-on to how I imagined them in the book.  I was sitting at the library today gazing around when I saw this book again on the shelf (in the wrong place, I might add), and the haunting eyes of “Rahab” on the cover just seems to make the book stand out amongst all the others.

To my understanding, “Pearl in the Sand” is Tessa Afshar’s first published novel.  Although I found that fact to be a little obvious at times, I took it into consideration and gave a little grace.  I’ve read other books by well-known writers that read worse.  Rather, I found myself to be quite impressed by the depth of Afshar’s well-crafted story.  There was something meaty and substantial about it.  I think one of the things that stood out the most to me was how organic the characters seemed.  In the person of Rahab, we have a great example of character development.  How did Rahab, known as a woman of faith, become a prostitute in the first place?  How, as a woman living in an ancient civilization, did she come to own her own house in the city walls?  Why did she not conduct business in the temple as most other harlots did?  What was it that drew Rahab to seek God?  Taking the basic facts we know about her from Scripture, Tessa was able to develop convincing background and an “after-Jericho” story for her that naturally flowed and was intriguing.

I learned so much from reading about this fictionalized story of one of the strongest women of faith in the Bible.  Even though I cannot personally identify with the same exact things Rahab went through, it was a story I could find similar to my own in other ways.  Rahab carries a lot of baggage with her.  Even though she comes to find faith, loving care and forgiveness from God, not everything is healed in her heart overnight.  God uses others to come alongside her to peel away the onion layers, so to speak.  One of those ways is through Salmone, our hero of the story.

In many romance novels, the heroine is rescued from dire circumstances by a perfect handsome hunk who arrives to save the day and then her troubles are no more and they live happily ever after.  In fact, the book usually ends with a proposal, and if that’s all the type of book we were to ever read, we’d get the impression that romance ends right there.  After all, romance hinges on suspense, right?  Not so in this story.  Yes, Salmone is the “handsome hunk,” but he quickly finds he can’t solve all of Rahab’s problems.  He has some problems of his own.  The only way the pair can build a marriage together is through his humbling his heart, by his allowing God’s grace work through him, and through Rahab’s gradual realization that God values her.  Although there was a lot of deep problems for them to work through, they decided to work through them together, and in that respect they forged a stronger marriage and a greater intimacy than a couple without problems.

I have read others’ online reveiws comparing this novel to the Christian equivalent of a bodice-ripper.  I strongly disagree and argue those readers have missed the point.  There are some books (yes, even Christian fiction) that seem to have sex as it’s suspension.  I have an opinion about that, although I won’t take up more space in this review about it (maybe some other time).  “Pearl in the Sand,” does include some rather ‘zestful’ scenes, EXCLUDING graphic details.  This book probably won’t be for all audiences.  However, –and I want to make this point clear–, in no way did I feel these parts of the story to be the goal driving the book.  The plot didn’t hinge on it, and I didn’t feel the author meant it to.  California Sunset, Lovers on the Beach by Amanda Valena, via FlickrRather, there were deeper issues going on in the lives of the characters (Rahab’s sense of unworthiness, Salmone’s pride) and they discovered that the marriage bed did not escape the effects of their baggage.  I felt Afshar was able to balance her romance scenes and use them in a constructive way that portrayed realism.  In Salmone, we see a character who learns to put aside his desires for the care of his wife’s soul (something lacking in bodice-rippers).  Truthfully, for these reasons I was able to handle this romance novel a lot better than a previous one I recently felt I had to give up.

Another complaint out there is the unbelievability of Rahab’s conversion.  I don’t think it has to be unbelievable.  When you’ve got a character who has felt dead inside for many years, who has been turned off by merciless gods, and who does not even know who she is anymore, –to hear of a holy God who cares about His people immediately appeals to her.  Her heart is yearning for cleansing from what she knows in her spirit is wrong.  After learning more about Him, she finds God is willing to extend His love and grace to her.  Her soul is watered with His acceptance of her, something she’s never had even from her own family.  God’s presence with her feels more real than anything she has ever sensed before.  This is not a seemingly overnight conversion!  It is the result of many years of thirsting, even if she did not know it.

Although the book was a relatively short read, I took my time going through it and copying down many quotes.  There are many great conversations between several characters.  I’m definitely keeping my eye on this author in the coming years!

“Pearl in the Sand” does belong in the romance genre.  However, unlike shallow romance novels, I believe this deep story is a cut above.  Because through it all, you see that it is more of a story of God wooing Rahab to Himself.  Even if you know the story of Rahab, this should keep your attention because it doesn’t end with and the walls came tumbling down.  So if you’re in the search for a substantial love story, this 5-star (in my opinion) romance will satisfy!

Leave a comment

Posted by on August 16, 2014 in Book Reviews


Tags: , , , , , , ,